The Unbarred Door

The Unbarred Door
When on America’s eastern plain
Still roamed her forest child,
And the new homes of Europe’s sons
Were rising in the wild.
Upon a clearing in a wood
Amos had built his cot;
He tilled his little farm
And lived contented with his lot.
A just, peace-loving man was he,
Kind unto all and true,
And well his ever-open door,
The wandering Indian knew.
But often were the settler’s lands.
By force or fraud obtained
And to the Red man dispossessed,
Revenge alone remained.
And ’round the blazing fire of logs
When winter nights were cold,
To shuddering listeners, dreadful tales
Of Indian raids were told.
But Amos feared not, though his home
All undefended lay,
And still his never-belted door
Was open night and day.
One morn a neighbor passed in haste;
“Indians, they say, are nigh,
So Amos, bolt your door tonight
And keep your powder dry.”
“My friend,” said he, the God I serve
Commands me not to kill,
And sooner would I yield my life
Than disobey his will.
“One gun I have, but used alone
Against the wolf or bear,
To point it at my fellow-man,
My hand would never dare.
“But I shall put the thing away.
They shall not see it here.
For the old gun in hands unskilled,
Might do some harm, I fear.
“Besides, the Indians are my friends
They would not do me ill,
Here they have found an open door
And they shall find it still.”
“Well,” said the neighbor, as he went,
“My faith is not so clear.
If wretches come to take my life,
I mean to sell it dear.”
But the good wife of Amos stood,
And listened with affright.
“Unless,” she said, “that door is fast,
I shall not sleep tonight.”
And with her words as women can
She urged her husband sore,
Till for the sake of household peace,
At last he barred the door.
They went to rest, and soon the wife
Was wrapped in slumbers deep;
But Amos turned and tossed about,
And vainly tried to sleep.
Then came a voice within his heart,
A mild rebuke it bore.
It whispered, “Thou of little faith
Why hast thou barred thy door?”
‘Weak is that poor defense of thine
Against a hostile band;
Stronger than strongest fortresses,
The shadow of my hand.”
“Hast thou not said, these many times?
That I have power to save,
As when my servants trembling feet,
Were sinking ‘neath the wave?”
“Now let thy actions with thy words
In full accord agree;
Rise quickly and unbar thy door
And trust alone in Me.”
Then Amos from his bed arose.
And softly trod the floor;
Crept down the stairs and noiselessly
Unbarred the cottage door.
Then forth he looked into the night;
Starlight it was, and still
And slowly rose the waning moon.
Behind the tree-ringed hill.
He looked with trustful, reverent gaze
Up to the starry sky,
As meets a child with loving glance,
A tender father’s eye.
The cloud was lifted from his brow,
His doubts were over now,
The cool air breathed a kiss of peace
Upon his tranquil brow.
Then back to his forsaken bed
He slowly groped his way,
And slept the slumber of the just,
Until the dawn of day.
That night a painted warrior band
Through the dark forest sped,
With steps as light upon the leaves
As panthers’ stealthy tread.
They reached the farm; “we make no war,
With good and faithful men,”
The foremost Indian turned and said,
“Here dwells a son of Penn.”
“But brother, if still his heart is right.
How shall we surely know?”
Answered another; “Time brings change.
And oft turns friend to foe.”
Said the first one, “I will go
And gently try the door;
If open still it proves
His heart is as it was before.”
It yielded and they entered in.
Across the room they stepped,
And came where Amos and his wife.
Calm and unconscious slept.
With tomahawk and scalping knife.
They stood beside the pair.
A solemn stillness filled the room;
An angel guard was there.
The eye sought eye and seemed to say.
How sound the good man sleeps!
So may they rest, and fear no ill,
Whom the Great Spirit keeps.
Then noiselessly they left the room
And closed the door behind,
And on their deadly war trail passed.
Some other prey to find.
And horror shrieked around their steps.
And bloodshed marked their way,
And many homes were desolate.
When rose another day.
But Amos with a thankful heart
Greeted the morning light,
And knew not until after years
How near was death that night.
—Author Unknown

The Hand of God

I was reading in 1 Chronicles 21  about King David.  The Lord had told Israel NOT to do a census of the people, but King David decided it was time.  Joab one of  King Davids men tried to talk the king out it, but King David prevailed so most of Israel was numbered.  The Lord was not happy with David and sent the prophet Gad to tell David to choose his punishment.  Davids choices were 3 years of famine, 3 months of being at the mercy of his enemies, or 3 days of a plague across the land…David chose door number 3.

So a plague went through out Israel and killed 75,000 people – David prayed that God would spare them…since the people didn’t sin…but him alone.  Now the angel of the Lord was ready to strike Jerusalem…but God – being merciful told the angel to stop.   Now the Angel of the Lord was standing by the door of the threashing floor of Ornan….Ornan’s 4 sons saw the angel and ran and hid.  Ornan just looked at the angel and went back to threashing his wheat…say WHAT????  Here is  the hand of the Lord – ready to strike and Ornan just kind of shrugs his shoulders, says eh and goes back to life as usual.  I was dumb founded when I saw that…but the story goes on.

Then David was instructed to go to the threashing floor of Ornan and make offerings to God, so David set out for the threashing floor of Ornan. David arrived at Ornan’s threashing floor and Ornan ran out and bowed at David’s feet.  David offered to buy the floor from Ornan…but Ornan says NO – I will give it to you along with the animals needed for the sacrifice.  But David said he must pay for the floor because (now catch this)…David says I will not offer anything that costs me nothing.   Now David had wanted to go and worship at  Gibeon , but he was afraid of the Angel so he didn’t go.

Did you see what I saw just then?  Two different people faced with the same problem – the hand of the Lord was heavy on the land….ones reaction was repentance…the others was to basically ignore the problem and go about life as usual.  We are seeing that same thing across our land right now…God’s hedge of protection is lifting off of America because we have forsaken God and thrown Him out of our country and out of our lives.

Now there are some that see this happening and have turned to God and repented. However, there are countless others like Ornan who say “eh” and go about business as usual.  Most  are saying a loving God would never punish us. While that is true God is loving and merciful….but He is also just.  We have asked Him to leave our land….we have legislated Him out of our land….so He is leaving us to the life WE have chosen – with all its consequences.

Now the question becomes what will you do when the hand of the Lord comes against this land?  Will you stand in utter defiance and basically shrug at God and say eh?  Or will do you what King David did and repent? It cost David something to repent – remember David wouldn’t offer anything that cost Him nothing.  Maybe it will cost you a friend, maybe a job or you could end up in jail because of your faith.  Repentance may even cost you  your life. Knowing all that the question that remains is; are you willing to repent and though it cost you everything?

Some people I know believe in a pre-trib rapture, others a mid-trib rapture and still for others a post-trib rapture. Regardless of where you stand on the rapture…think of what the world will look like in the near future. Looking around at world today – its easy to see that the ‘church’ age is coming to an end. When that end comes – what will the world look like? What will your life look like?
As the world turns further away from God…the differences between Christians and the world will be glaring. Christians will be hated – even more than they are today and our beliefs and lifestyle itself will be seen as criminal. Think of your family, friends and co-workers who don’t know Jesus as their savior and how they will see you.
Brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles ,cousins, sons and daughters…all seeing you as hateful….seeing you as the enemy. Even those in your church who are really Christians in name only will line up to turn you in for your crime of being a Christian. How will you respond?
I have heard some Christians say they will fight to the death to protect what is theirs – their family, their friends, their lifestyle. Still others say they will comply with the ruling authories to the best of their abilities – after all the authority is set up by God himself. There is another group however – that will fight, but without violence. They will stand on the Word of God and defy the ruling authorities…they will preach the Word, even when told to sit down and shut up.
This group of fighters will preach in prisons, on street corners, in bombed out buildings and yes even while waiting in line to be executed. Why? Why can’t they just be normal like everyone else? Why can’t they see how divisive they are being? While the world around them is cheering on the Christians deaths…the Christian is weeping because he sees hell itself swallowing the souls of those around him.
The Christians that stand up on God’s Word does so – so that not one person would be lost. The Christian that preaches, preaches so that the shackles holding their loved ones would fall off. Those standing in lines waiting to die – do so not because they want to die, but because their Savior died for them.
So while you are sitting in your car in that traffic jam….when you are sitting in your pew on Sunday or at the dinner table with family and friends – look around. However, this time look around with the eyes of Jesus…do they know Jesus as their savior? Do they stand ready to meet their Lord? Does your heart break right now for them….or are you simply contemplating your next trip…or attending another game. If thinking about the lost and dying souls around you doesn’t break your heart….what will?
Where will you be standing when the ‘church’ age comes to an end?

This is to address the ongoing conversations between Christians regarding the LGBTQ community and the ‘church’.  First let me say that I don’t see a lot of love on either side.  If you are feeling anger toward those on the opposite side – you need to stop and pray.  First pray that God gives you a heart of love toward them. Second pray that in all your conversations what you say and do would be pleasing to God.  Now that being said….lets get into it shall we.

I saw an article on  a friends Facebook page that talked about how tired he was of Christians being ‘offended’ by the LGBTQ community. I am not offended by your lifestyle, I am offended by sin.  I am offended by a church that has watered down the Word of God so much that it is worth nothing to those listening to it.  I am offended by those who think that         (” Judge not, that you be not judged ” Matthew 7:1) means that you cannot speak out against sin.

To those in the church and in the world who say Jesus never addressed homosexuality in the bible He only taught on love, that is only partially correct.  While it is true that Jesus did not speak to it in the New Testament…He did address it in the Old Testament.  How could Jesus address it in the Old Testament when He wasn’t born yet? According to John 1:1-3 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.” So that means that Jesus was there at creation.  Jesus was there when this particular sin was addressed, so there was no need to address it again.

However there are some that would say  the simple absence of mention by Jesus means that God has changed His mind and now its no longer a sin. That would mean that the Word of God is not accurate and true…I say this because Gods Word says “For I am the Lord, I do not change; Therefore you are not consumed, O sons of Jacob. Malachi 3:6  So if God does not change – then His definition of sin does not change.

 What do we do now?  We love them. We love them enough to show them the truth of Gods Word.  What they choose to do with Gods Word once they are shown is not up to you, all you are called to do it tell them. If  we do not tell them and they die in their sin we are guilty of their blood – as if we had killed them ourselves.”When I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. Ezekiel 3:18

So put aside popular notions, political correctness and the go along to get along mentality.  Decide today whether Gods Word is true or not.  If you decide that God’s Word is not true and is in error – then nothing in it is accurate including your salvation.  Harsh I know but if part is a lie – then all is a lie.  If you decide today that God’s Word is indeed true – then you need to live as if its true.  Let us put aside the live and let live spirit that has engulfed the church and instead replace it with a broken spirit.  We need to love our neighbors, friends, and family enough to tell them that God loved us so much that He gave His only son as a sacrifice for all our sins. We need that love to drive us to pray for them, to contend with them and for them.

Well that is my take – I ask that you prayerfully consider the situation.

This is a repost written by .

The Push For Eradicating Christians! Researchers Document Anti-Christian Agenda Among Powerful Elite

A student is punished for refusing to “stomp on Jesus,” a Christian baker faces a year in jail for refusing to cater faux marriages, two men are arrested for reading the Bible aloud near a government building, a school “purges” Christian works from its library. Critics asserting the existence of an institutional anti-Christian bias, and a resultant war on the faith, have often been labeled paranoid. But now two University of North Texas sociologists have produced research showing that just such an agenda exists — among America’s most powerful people.

Professors George Yancey and David Williamson shared their findings in their newly released book So Many Christians, So Few Lions: Is There Christianophobia in the United States? The researchers say that while Christianophobia — which the sociologists define as “unreasonable hatred or fear of Christians” — isn’t common among common people, it does characterize those in the upper echelons of American society. It’s intense, too. The book’s title was apparently inspired by elitist interviewees lamenting how there were “so few lions,” referencing the Roman Empire’s practice of throwing Christians into an arena to be slaughtered by the wild cats. One respondent even remarked that Christians “should be eradicated without hesitation or remorse.”

This is something about which Christians “should be concerned,” reports the Christian Post, on a warning Yancey issued in an e-mail interview, “because those with ‘Christianophobia’ tend to be powerful elites with influence in certain important areas, such as higher education.” Commenting on this and the professors’ motivation for conducting their research, Yancey told the Post, “There is a lot of literature on hostility toward many different groups but just about none on hostility toward Christians. Yet when we collected qualitative data from cultural progressive activists we quickly saw some of the unnecessary vitriol and fears within many of our respondents. We also saw the social status of those who exhibited this hatred and many of them would be in positions that allowed them to at least subtly act on their anger and fears.” As for the sources of their data, the Post writes that it “comes from a large national survey, the American National Election Survey, and interviews they conducted with members of liberal advocacy organizations.”

And some of the remarks made by the “cultural progressive activists” are eyebrow-raising. The Blaze reports on a sampling referencing the “Christian right”:

“I want them all to die in a fire.” (Male, aged 26-35 with Doctorate).

“They should be eradicated without hesitation or remorse. Their only purpose is to damage and inflict their fundamentalist virus onto everyone they come in contact with.” (Female, aged 66-75 with Master’s degree).

“They make me a believer in eugenics…. They pollute good air…. I would be in favor of establishing a state for them…. If not, then sterilize them so they can’t breed more.” (Male, aged 46-55 with Master’s degree).

This brazen hatred brings us to something else motivating the researchers. Yancey in the Post again:

Another aspect that drove me to work on this project was that while I consistently saw evidence of Christianophobia in other areas of my life and in our society, unlike other types of intolerances, those who exhibited Christianophobia do not tend to think that they are intolerant. Usually those who do not like blacks or Muslims admit that they are intolerant but simply try to justify their intolerance. Those with Christianophobia tend to deny that they are intolerant but rather that they are fairly interpreting social reality. Envisioning themselves as fair and free of intolerance allows them to blame those they detest.

This reflects the common modern usage (and misuse) of the term “tolerance,” which is supposed to pertain to a person’s ability to abide a perceived negative. We wouldn’t have to “tolerate” a fine car or delectable meal; we relish those things. But we would have to tolerate bad weather or a stubborn cold. In this sense, not liking blacks, Muslims, or Christians is not indicative of intolerance; quite the opposite, only a person with such feelings could exhibit tolerance with respect to such a group because he perceives the group as a negative. If he liked the group or was indifferent to it, he couldn’t exhibit tolerance because there would be nothing for him to have to tolerate.

So there are two relevant questions here: Is the perceived negative an objective negative? And is the intolerance truly justified? Examples:

• You may dislike exercising self-discipline (emotion, remember, isn’t logical), but recognize that since it’s objectively good, your feelings are disordered; thus, when you tolerate its exercise, it’s virtuous.

• You may dislike a neighbor boy’s piano playing. But while you have a moral right to your tastes in this case, practicing an instrument isn’t objectively bad; thus, tolerating it in the name of good fellowship is virtuous.

• You will surely dislike having the flu, and it is objectively negative. Once you’ve done all you can to ameliorate the symptoms, however, keeping a stiff upper lip and tolerating it is virtuous.

• Almost all of us dislike theft, and rightly so because it’s morally wrong. And tolerating it would be a severe fault because when dealing with a remediable objective negative, the only virtue lies in wiping it out.

The same applies to belief. We may recognize someone’s First Amendment right to espouse Nazism, but should we be tolerant of Nazism itself? Likewise, should the Spaniards have been tolerant of the Aztec religion prescribing the sacrificial slaughter of thousands of innocents? Many today believe that tolerance is ever and always a virtue, but as Greek philosopher Aristotle put it, “Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Tolerance of vice is vice itself.

So the question about the anti-Christian elitists isn’t whether they’re intolerant. By definition they are: They view Christianity as a negative and want it purged from society. The only question is whether their intolerance is justifiable. Does it serve to preserve understanding of Truth and expose lies or just the opposite? As to this, Dr. Yancey pointed out that Christianophobes claim to believe “that they are fairly interpreting social reality” but don’t “recognize how their emotions have distorted their intellectual judgments.” In other words, they don’t realize that what their feelings tell them is negative isn’t actually objectively so. But why do they have these disordered feelings?

It’s an old story. We all have had the experience of rendering some constructive criticism, only to have the object of it react with anger. No one likes having his bubble burst. And the more attached to the misbegotten idea the person is, the stronger his resistance will be — and the more viciously he may attack those who dare challenge his illusions.

In this relativistic age of “If it feels good, do it” where sin is in, Christianity upholds the absolute, unchanging, nonnegotiable standard of morality. It tells people that their sins really are sins — not just lifestyle choices — and that they’ll be judged for them. And just as one small pin can burst a balloon, a tiny bit of Truth can shatter a rationalization.

It’s no surprise Yancey found that anti-Christian elitists are generally “white, educated [miseducated, actually] and wealthy.” These are not just the “idle minds” that are the “Devil’s playground” or, to echo George Orwell, the kind of people who could believe truly absurd ideas: intellectuals. They also invariably are advocates for some anti-Christian movement, such as feminism or our Great Sexual Heresy. They not only usually indulge sin (people tend to push what they’re attached to), but have come to believe that their very happiness depends on the realization of their social vision — and Christianity stands in its way. And there’s something that is often a corollary of “If it feels good, do it”:

If it feels bad, destroy it.


There is no middle ground for the church anymore.  God has drawn a line in the sand and we must now choose where to stand. Do you stand for God and His Word or do you stand with whatever society deems acceptable?  Rise up church for the days of your ease are over!! Rise up Christian for now is your time to take a spiritual stand…and having done all to stand…STAND!!

For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, Ephesians 6:12-14

Mark of the Beast

Revelation 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

Please notice that ONLY the King James Version deals with this type of technology. The verse says IN their right hand while other versions changed it to say ON their right hands. Man changed it (in my opinion) because they couldn’t imagine a technology would exist that would allow something to be seen that was IN their hands or foreheads. Isn’t God’s word awesome that He saw the technology and used just one little word -IN – to let us know that He does see and hold the future in HIS hands and NOTHING is a surprise to HIM.


Andreas Sjöström strolls through Stockholm airport